D
dragon eyes
Guest
Organising tours to treblinka and Wolfs Lair,disgusting, I mean how can anyone can still deny the holocaust happened in this day and age,it's just unbelievable
- Status
Harry Angstrom
Striker
No idea why it should be illegal.
Surely people should be able to believe what they like.
You can believe what you want, it's when you express or act upon those thoughts when it becomes problematic.
just this really.
Some Random Guy
Striker
I don't think it should be illegal because I want daft twats that think it was fake to out themselves.
Harry Angstrom
Striker
Why is expression of a thought problematic?
alzeebub
Striker
It's not illegal in the UK, I believe. Ridiculous that it can be illegal anywhere, imo.
Keawyeds
Striker
No actual physical solid proof for the existent of a deity, but it ain't illegal to believe in that. Well... depending on where you are I suppose.
Thing is, there's solid proof that the holocaust happened and dinosaurs existed.
Anyone who believes otherwise should be.... educated
alzeebub
Striker
Educated, absolutely, but not silenced. Same with religious folk.
Keawyeds
Striker
It's my answer to a lot of things.
Believe it or not it came from Batman and Robin - Not a great film, but Jim Carrey's The Riddler says this - "If you kill him, he won't learn nothing".
Same attitude I take to The Death Penalty and paedos.
Although that said, you can't re-educate paedo's as they are wired wrong in their brains. Basically we need another (smaller) Australia to send them all to.
:roll:
Harry Angstrom
Striker
The feeble minded need your protection.
Would you do away with libel laws, the criminal offence of incitement to riot, regulation of what gets taught in schools or regulation of the press and media and advertising?
Harry Angstrom
Striker
Of course not, that wasn't the issue here.
Your question implied you don't see how people communicating an idea can be problematic in a way that requires legal intervention. You didn't say only in this instance
T
The Omega Man
Guest
Surprised Mossad havent bumped the fucker off by now.
Harry Angstrom
Striker
I cannot be held responsible for how you interpret the world. If you think I was implying, from that post, that libel laws should be scrapped then I need to be more comprehensive in my posts.
You don't need to be comprehensive in your posts, you just need to distinguish between the definite and indefinite article. Or not mind when people assume you're just being awkward for the sake of it and roll their eyes instead of engaging with the point
- Status
