Que sera sera
Winger
People are looking at this too literally as to how they perceive it will affect their personal experience. My reasons for supporting this change are primarily the three listed in the e-petition shown below. Basically, I don't see how the council and Club aren't best placed to make these decisions. Clubs like Hartlepool etc could do with earning an extra few grand a year and paying out a few grand less in stewards.
I don't necessarily want to drink during the game, but I want to be trusted to have the choice.
"This law should be amended for the following reasons:
Discriminatory - This discriminates against football fans and reeks of class bias.
Anti-Competitive - The law as it stands clearly gives other sports clubs e.g. rugby clubs, an unfair competitive advantage over football clubs in their sales of hospitality and sponsorship packages especially when they share a city or even a stadium.
Outdated - Football has changed beyond all recognition in recent years. The reason for the implementation of the act is no longer valid.
The decision on which games and which areas should be granted a license should be left to the local authority who understand any risks rather than a blanket ban."
Read more: http://yellowsforum.co.uk/thread/19455/criminalisation-oxford-united-fans?page=1#ixzz3HlT1t1QD"
I don't necessarily want to drink during the game, but I want to be trusted to have the choice.
"This law should be amended for the following reasons:
Discriminatory - This discriminates against football fans and reeks of class bias.
Anti-Competitive - The law as it stands clearly gives other sports clubs e.g. rugby clubs, an unfair competitive advantage over football clubs in their sales of hospitality and sponsorship packages especially when they share a city or even a stadium.
Outdated - Football has changed beyond all recognition in recent years. The reason for the implementation of the act is no longer valid.
The decision on which games and which areas should be granted a license should be left to the local authority who understand any risks rather than a blanket ban."
A quote from an attendee at today's FSF forum: "As football fans we face a level of treatment not afforded to other citizens in our society. I can't drink a beer at football but a rugby fan can drink at rugby pitch side. An attendee at a concert at the Emirates can drink a beer during the concert but an Arsenal fan cannot. Yet Home Office research shows that the restriction on alcohol at games, hence forcing faster drinking before the game in a condensed time period, and also at half time, actually creates flashpoints by virtue of a deadline. The imposition of extra regulation increases the risk to fans.It is extra drink, because no one would just grab "1 drink" - they'd grab 3 or 4 to prevent them running back and forth and within the 3 or 4 drinks some people can hack it, some people can't. And the people who can't are breaching yet another law within the Sporting Events Act by being drunk within a Football ground.
It is probably impossible to re-consider the law unless they'd re-consider the Entering a Football Ground whilst intoxicated law also.
Read more: http://yellowsforum.co.uk/thread/19455/criminalisation-oxford-united-fans?page=1#ixzz3HlT1t1QD"
Last edited: