New World Order

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Exile said:
Gobal flood command and control centre/refuge - that's my guess. Unlikely to be anything to do with biohazard because even the Americans wouldn't so daft to put one under an airport.
Click to expand...

I'd guess all commands are there including biohazard. Just look at the ventilation shafts, enormous, no need to be that size. And yes, they are that daft. Have you not seen Resident Evil? The Umbrella corporation has loads of these iceberg-esque subterranean lairs around the world, getting up to some nefarious shit.
 


Merv said:
OK. 2 questions

Does David Icke believe that some people are what he and some others call 'reptilians' or does he not? I could probably find the vid where he says he's seen someone turning into one.

Knowing just that one example of his delusions, are you still happy to read his books and take them seriously?
Click to expand...

he does and so do a lot of others. icke has never witnessed this but he has researched and has witness testimony from people who have.

his books are very real and don't focus on the reptilian agenda although it does make up some of the content. you should read one to find out

ravydavygravy said:
So Haliburton 'forced' Gulf War 2 on dubya?
Click to expand...

not forced, the bush family empire are complicit. prescott bush (dubya's grandfather) was a director of dresser industries which was a mirror company to halliburton, his son, the first george bush, worked for them in the 50's.

in the 90's, dresser industries, a company that prescott bush sat on board of directors and halliburton merged, making a mega corporation.

when you piece things together can you see how war would be beneficial for bush family empire - their company makes billions their family controls the nation, the worlds superpower
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
ravydavygravy said:
Tar.

Any beleivers know how they lean on the government? Thats the bit no one seems to answer.

Turn the pm? Mind control? Chinese burns?
Click to expand...

they control the financial institutions which is all the leverage needed - an actual government is relatively small fry
 
ProfessionalMackem said:
Yep, you're right. It is the best location to build an underground military town. Other subterranean lairs built into mountains (Cheyenne Mountain), were very labour intensive and costly. Denver has the advantage of being at high altitude with with only topsoil to contend with, they only have to dig down. Lets not kid ourselves, the base was the primary focus not the Airport.

Question is, what is Queen Lizzy doing with land just outside the airport? Why does the Crown need so much of this pointless land around the world?
Click to expand...

because their bloodline/family owns so much.

Queen Elizabeth II, head of state of the United Kingdom and of 31 other states and territories, is the legal owner of about 6,600 million acres of land, one sixth of the earth’s non ocean surface.

She is the only person on earth who owns whole countries, and who owns countries that are not her own domestic territory. This land ownership is separate from her role as head of state and is different from other monarchies where no such claim is made – Norway, Belgium, Denmark etc.

The value of her land holding. £17,600,000,000,000 (approx)

http://www.whoownstheworld.com/about-the-book/largest-landowner/
 
ravydavygravy said:
I think that's partly true.

The belief however that there's another level of organisation above the corporations controlling it all is a bat shit mental though.
Click to expand...

The book 'The Committee of 300' by John Coleman (former British spook) gives us an insight into the hidden hand that controls the upper echelons of society. Even then the select cabal that sit above this committee we will probably never really know. Fantastically researched factual book with plenty to get your teeth into.

Logon or register to see this image

We could probably add a few more newer ad-hoc organisations to that web now.

Here is a link to a brief synopsis to the book;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/New_World_Order/Committee_of_300.html

Here is the man himself giving a talk on it back in the 90's, forgive the poor video quality, can't find a better one kicking about.

 
ProfessionalMackem said:
There's no real need to lean anymore. Maybe in the past, but not today. Nowadays the governments in so called power don't answer to the people, they answer to companies and corporations. All they need to do is throw money and they get want they want. Failing that they just bump you off, i.e David Kelly and Robin Cook.
Click to expand...

Surely money has pretty much always ruled nations and dictated wars. In our country's history the Romans, Vikings, Normans and others probably before have come here for economic reasons.

By the time of the middle ages Kings had to borrow money from banks to finance wars, which were needed to pay pack debts from previous loans. In our own country landowners have been more powerful than the King - the government at the time.

Outside of a totalitarian communist (USSR/China) when has a government really been able to tell the money to get fucked. Even those had the benefit massive land areas/population and a less connected world. They also most likely were worst to live in than the company/controlled nations.

In general things are getting better so not too sure what's to worry about.
 
Gonzo Mackem said:
Surely money has pretty much always ruled nations and dictated wars. In our country's history the Romans, Vikings, Normans and others probably before have come here for economic reasons.

By the time of the middle ages Kings had to borrow money from banks to finance wars, which were needed to pay pack debts from previous loans. In our own country landowners have been more powerful than the King - the government at the time.

Outside of a totalitarian communist (USSR/China) when has a government really been able to tell the money to get fucked. Even those had the benefit massive land areas/population and a less connected world. They also most likely were worst to live in than the company/controlled nations.

In general things are getting better so not too sure what's to worry about.
Click to expand...

what things marra?
 
aukq said:
because their bloodline/family owns so much.

Queen Elizabeth II, head of state of the United Kingdom and of 31 other states and territories, is the legal owner of about 6,600 million acres of land, one sixth of the earth’s non ocean surface.

She is the only person on earth who owns whole countries, and who owns countries that are not her own domestic territory. This land ownership is separate from her role as head of state and is different from other monarchies where no such claim is made – Norway, Belgium, Denmark etc.

The value of her land holding. £17,600,000,000,000 (approx)

http://www.whoownstheworld.com/about-the-book/largest-landowner/
Click to expand...

Her main holdings are Canada, the 2nd largest country on earth, with 2,467 million acres, Australia, the 7th largest country on earth with 1,900 million acres, the Papua New Guinea with114 million acres, New Zealand with 66 million acres and the UK with 60 million acres.

Yes the Queen is the legal owner of Canada, Australia, Papua New Guinea. :lol::lol:

aukq said:
what things marra?
Click to expand...

Living standards
Life expectancy
Working hours/conditions

Three pretty major ones just there.
 
Gonzo Mackem said:
Surely money has pretty much always ruled nations and dictated wars. In our country's history the Romans, Vikings, Normans and others probably before have come here for economic reasons.

By the time of the middle ages Kings had to borrow money from banks to finance wars, which were needed to pay pack debts from previous loans. In our own country landowners have been more powerful than the King - the government at the time.

Outside of a totalitarian communist (USSR/China) when has a government really been able to tell the money to get fucked. Even those had the benefit massive land areas/population and a less connected world. They also most likely were worst to live in than the company/controlled nations.

In general things are getting better so not too sure what's to worry about.
Click to expand...
The king of France had massive debts to the Knights templar. He told them to get fucked and killed their leaders and drove them underground. This happened on Friday the 13th
 
Gonzo Mackem said:
Her main holdings are Canada, the 2nd largest country on earth, with 2,467 million acres, Australia, the 7th largest country on earth with 1,900 million acres, the Papua New Guinea with114 million acres, New Zealand with 66 million acres and the UK with 60 million acres.

Yes the Queen is the legal owner of Canada, Australia, Papua New Guinea. :lol::lol:



Living standards
Life expectancy
Working hours/conditions

Three pretty major ones just there.
Click to expand...


Land ownership in Canada is held by governments, Native groups, corporations, and individuals. Canada is the second largest country in the world by area; at 9,093,507 km² or 3,511,085 mi² of land (and more if fresh water is included) it occupies more than 6% of the Earth's surface. Since Canada uses primarily English-derived common law, the holders of the land actually have land tenure (permission to hold land from the Crown) rather than absolute ownership.[1]
 
aukq said:
because their bloodline/family owns so much.

Queen Elizabeth II, head of state of the United Kingdom and of 31 other states and territories, is the legal owner of about 6,600 million acres of land, one sixth of the earth’s non ocean surface.

She is the only person on earth who owns whole countries, and who owns countries that are not her own domestic territory. This land ownership is separate from her role as head of state and is different from other monarchies where no such claim is made – Norway, Belgium, Denmark etc.

The value of her land holding. £17,600,000,000,000 (approx)

http://www.whoownstheworld.com/about-the-book/largest-landowner/
Click to expand...

Interesting facts. Makes you sick really. They're just her land assets too, we haven't even talked about her stock portfolio which is primarily made up from insider trading, as she's exempt from such petty things as laws.
 
greedminds said:
Land ownership in Canada is held by governments, Native groups, corporations, and individuals. Canada is the second largest country in the world by area; at 9,093,507 km² or 3,511,085 mi² of land (and more if fresh water is included) it occupies more than 6% of the Earth's surface. Since Canada uses primarily English-derived common law, the holders of the land actually have land tenure (permission to hold land from the Crown) rather than absolute ownership.[1]
Click to expand...

My point was the Queen is not the Crown. While she has private ownership of estates she doesn't own Canada.
 
aukq said:
you said the queen did in a previous post?
Click to expand...

With two little laughing fellas to suggest what I thought of the suggestion that the Queen privately owned Canada.

aukq said:
there will be billions around he world who don't agree
Click to expand...

Of course and unfortunately for many years there probably still will be but there are billions who would agree and world life expectancy, attitude to work, standards of living, education are improving. In developed countries we are further down the line but developing nations are generally improving not getting worse.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top