R
Roger Senseless
Guest
Guns.When has prohibition ever bee a successful policy?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Guns.When has prohibition ever bee a successful policy?
Isn't that exactly what they are debating? If it should be an illegal lifestyle choice. Seems ridiculous to me that it is for some things and not for others.
Depends how much and what we want to add into the pot. Unlike other drugs which, since the explosion of the 60s has been associated with counterculture alcohol has been part of the social fabric of this country for millennia, which despite making it impossible to prohibit is still open to abuse. With newer drugs imho we should treat those who use them like children in that if people can prove themselves to use the stuff responsibly then the rules can be relaxed.
I'm yet to be convinced. Like I say, I know to many people taking drugs whilst at work. I also know that some people still have a lunchtime drink but the effects are different to having a joint or two...in fact I know far too many people who skin up or toke for breakfast. That's the reality.The overwhelming majority of illegal drug users do use them responsibly.
I'm yet to be convinced. Like I say, I know to many people taking drugs whilst at work. I also know that some people still have a lunchtime drink but the effects are different to having a joint or two..
And on that note it would also help that we just stuck to the normal kind of cannabis we got in my youth but no...we had to breed stronger and stronger strains of the stuff until we got to White Widow levels which is neither use for man nor beast and has more implications for mental health issues.
Would the potency not be easier to control if drugs were legalised and their sale regulated? The strength of just about all mass produced premium lagers has decreased over the last few years simply by changing tax thresholds.
The people get what the people want. I can't see it putting the Vietnamese growing trade out of business and do you really reckon that people will be satisfied without their skunk? I don't. Red Leb and Moroccan Black just doesn't cut it anymore I'm afraid.
The people get what the people want. I can't see it putting the Vietnamese growing trade out of business and do you really reckon that people will be satisfied without their skunk? I don't. Red Leb and Moroccan Black just doesn't cut it anymore I'm afraid.
Not in my experience. Folk I know will only touch green, and not your normal weed either, you have to be able to see the THC. and anything solid is pretty much a rarity.You're wrong there fella. Red Leb and Moroccan Black of a good quality would be very welcome, and I know many, many stoners who'd agree with that. It's not all about strength.
How about a labelling regime, where the strength of the drug is clearly stated on the package, and there is proof that the product is from a legitimate source. The strength could be related to different tax bands. There could also be a government programme of adverts and health advice showing us the best and safest way to take our drugs, and to warn people of the dangers of over-indulgence?I'm yet to be convinced. Like I say, I know to many people taking drugs whilst at work. I also know that some people still have a lunchtime drink but the effects are different to having a joint or two...in fact I know far too many people who skin up or toke for breakfast. That's the reality.
And on that note it would also help that we just stuck to the normal kind of cannabis we got in my youth but no...we had to breed stronger and stronger strains of the stuff until we got to White Widow levels which is neither use for man nor beast and has more implications for mental health issues.
How about a labelling regime, where the strength of the drug is clearly stated on the package, and there is proof that the product is from a legitimate source. The strength could be related to different tax bands. There could also be a government programme of adverts and health advice showing us the best and safest way to take our drugs, and to warn people of the dangers of over-indulgence?
Not in my experience. Folk I know will only touch green, and not your normal weed either, you have to be able to see the THC. and anything solid is pretty much a rarity.
Watch "The Culture High" good drug documentary talking about how corrupt the government is
Drugs policy in the UK is broadly right. Drug use is falling in all catagories, deaths from drugs are falling too.
Most debate about drugs policy is based on a false dichotomy - you are either tough on drugs (harsher sentences) or soft on drugs (treatment not prison). In fact a sensible drugs policy has both - treatment services for those willing to change behaviour, prison for those who wont.
Behind the scenes however there has been a huge change over the last 10 years. Education in schools is massively better, such that attitudes towards drugs from younger people are much less pro-drugs than my generation was. Health care services are loads better - the NHS has more beds for detox and more consultants than ever before. The introduction of drug treatment orders and arrest referral schemes has been mostly succesful.
The right wing lobbyists who see more prison as a solution for everything are still making as much noise as before but frankly most people realise that expanding the treatment and recovery end of services rather than prison places has caused the fall in drug use.
The biggest priorities in the debate on drugs policy should be protecting current treatment services from cuts, extending anti-drugs education programmes, and slowly but steadily shifting resources from prison to treatment. Prison, should however, always be an option, particularly for dealers
Legalisation is a blind alley imho
Would you agree to the same treatment for those drinking alcohol and tobacco?
You mean NHS treatment services? The NHS provides services for drinkers and smokers.