Why We Didn't Sign Ulloa

Status
Not open for further replies.


Would have required peddling one of Jozy or Graham and they weren't exactly going to fly off the shelf
Sounds spot on to me. We had those 2 wasters, and injured Fletcher and Wickham. The ridiculously big wages alone of Graham and the other one would scare off any club foolish enough to consider taking them on, let alone the fact they are both f***ing woeful. After 'Investments' like that, I fully understand the board not playing ball bringing another striker.
 
Digressing slightly, I still can't believe that Graham and Altidore have jobs playing in the Premier League.
I'd be happy if they went without a fee. Their presence is holding us back, and that could bite us on the arse in January.

After these comments you can guarantee he'll get one tomorrow now.

Yep.

Regardless, we should win tomorrow. That means we won't.
 
Why the hell would we buy on another striker that relies on crosses?

The ones we have would score regularly if we put more than one half decent ball across the six yard box a game!
 
I have formulated a totally incorrect theory, it's because his smegma was so pungent and acrid it would cause unrest in the dressing room. Reality says 'Let's stick with Jozy'(who I rate more)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top