Moon Mysteries.

Status
Not open for further replies.


IknowWhatILike said:
As per usual.

What is fact and can be sourced as such fairly reliably is wildly (if not purposefully) misinterpreted. The rest of the information has no credible source whatsoever, but is still presented as fact. Intentional misuse of quotes and everything in amongst that lot.

Amazes me anyone is gullible enough to believe it.
Click to expand...

So there is no mystery in the origins of the moon? I have no problems in distinguishing the ops facts and conjecture. All he's done is show us a mystery and offered up a few fancible speculations. Nowt to get your knickers in a twist over.

Oh aye another thing why don't you offer some insights of your own on this subject rather than snipe from the sidelines?

PinzaC55 said:
I dont know , what are the odds ? In order to to know the odds of something occurring you have to know how many times it has occurrred which in the case of the Sun and Moon is one ? How do you determine how many times it could occur ?
Click to expand...

By using the small sample we have with our 8 planets and 178 moons orbiting them.

The odds have been worked out and is next to zero.

Luckily for us a need has worked it out.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conservapedia:Symmetry_between_the_sun_and_the_moon
 
Last edited:
Charlie Chimp said:
So there is no mystery in the origins of the moon? I have no problems in distinguishing the ops facts and conjecture. All he's done is show us a mystery and offered up a few fancible speculations. Nowt to get your knickers in a twist over.

Oh aye another thing why don't you offer some insights of your own on this subject rather than snipe from the sidelines?
Click to expand...

Of course there is. thats what the first post highlighted. Hence why I replied to a post pointing out that it was fine to start with, then by post three was bullshit.

If you really need me to offer insight as to why the moon ISN'T an alien spacecraft, well, you could try googling 'density of the moon' or 'water vapour on the moon' and you could probably solve at least those two without a problem. As for its age, the only person claiming 5.3bn years is a psuedo-historian and I can see no credible source behind his work.

Thats more than I originally wanted to get involved anyway, because these threads always end the same way, but there you go.
 
Charlie Chimp said:
So there is no mystery in the origins of the moon? I have no problems in distinguishing the ops facts and conjecture. All he's done is show us a mystery and offered up a few fancible speculations. Nowt to get your knickers in a twist over.

Oh aye another thing why don't you offer some insights of your own on this subject rather than snipe from the sidelines?



By using the small sample we have with our 8 planets and 178 moons orbiting them.

The odds have been worked out and is next to zero.

Luckily for us a need has worked it out.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conservapedia:Symmetry_between_the_sun_and_the_moon
Click to expand...

There are between 100 and 400 billion stars in our galaxy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way
In the Universe there are are 100 to 200 billion galaxies, possibly more http://www.universetoday.com/30305/how-many-galaxies-in-the-universe/
Each of these stars potentially has an Earth and Moon orbiting it.

Your analogy is like getting a glass of water from the sea, finding no whales in it and declaring "There are no whales in the sea."
 
IknowWhatILike said:
Of course there is. thats what the first post highlighted. Hence why I replied to a post pointing out that it was fine to start with, then by post three was bullshit.

If you really need me to offer insight as to why the moon ISN'T an alien spacecraft, well, you could try googling 'density of the moon' or 'water vapour on the moon' and you could probably solve at least those two without a problem. As for its age, the only person claiming 5.3bn years is a psuedo-historian and I can see no credible source behind his work.

Thats more than I originally wanted to get involved anyway, because these threads always end the same way, but there you go.
Click to expand...

Which is all fair enough mate. Debate is healthy. No need to quantify your input.

The origin part of this thread is what intrigued me most. You would have thought by now that we would have it all down. But I guess science will always have some unanswered questions. I for one like the whacky theories. You don't have to believe them all, just good for the grey matter.
 
Linus said:
Ahh yes, the infamous Nazi Moon Base constructed in the late 1930's.
Click to expand...

That's why there's been no moon landings for years, there's no need to send anyone with the secret base, Lord Lucan, Elvis, Princess Di and some others are there, taken because they knew too much, they send rockets up to replenish the base and NASA will say the rocket is a shooting star or a comet,my mate who's into David Icke told me about it.
 
PinzaC55 said:
There are between 100 and 400 billion stars in our galaxy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way
In the Universe there are are 100 to 200 billion galaxies, possibly more http://www.universetoday.com/30305/how-many-galaxies-in-the-universe/
Each of these stars potentially has an Earth and Moon orbiting it.

Your analogy is like getting a glass of water from the sea, finding no whales in it and declaring "There are no whales in the sea."
Click to expand...

Are you god? How do you know these whales exist? We can only go off empirical data that we have observed.

Can you comment on the nerds findings?
 
Charlie Chimp said:
Which is all fair enough mate. Debate is healthy. No need to quantify your input.

The origin part of this thread is what intrigued me most. You would have thought by now that we would have it all down. But I guess science will always have some unanswered questions. I for one like the whacky theories. You don't have to believe them all, just good for the grey matter.
Click to expand...

I agree debate is good, and that science doesn't have answers for everything. HOWEVER, If one side is misrepresenting stuff I tend to prefer to point it out. Ie., the moon is actually a pretty dense satellite - the exact opposite of what the article states. Does that make all but one of the other moons in the solar system alien spacecraft too?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top