Moon Mysteries.

Status
Not open for further replies.
ProfessionalMackem said:
:lol:



Ehhh? Who by?



The chances are very small that this is a coincidence, in fact mathematicians have said it's near enough impossible. I don't believe in coincidences either, especially when it come to the moon, there are too many.
Click to expand...


Aliens Warned Us to Stay off the Moon!
A certain professor, who wished to remain anonymous, was engaged in a discussion with Neil Armstrong during a NASA symposium.

Professor: What REALLY happened out there with Apollo 11?

Armstrong: It was incredible, of course we had always known there was a possibility, the fact is, we were warned off! (by the Aliens). There was never any question then of a space station or a moon city.

Professor: How do you mean "warned off"?

Armstrong: I can't go into details, except to say that their ships were far superior to ours both in size and technology - Boy, were they big!... and menacing! No, there is no question of a space station.

Professor: But NASA had other missions after Apollo 11?

Armstrong: Naturally-NASA was committed at that time, and couldn't risk panic on Earth. But it really was a quick scoop and back again.

Armstrong confirmed that the story was true but refused to go into further detail, beyond admitting that the CIA was behind the cover-up.

There's more ...
 


Strange thread. I'm in the third year of an astrobiology degree - last year was primarily focussed on planetary formation and the origins of the solar system. Not really nay debate at all about he moon formation from what I can see. The isotopic ratios of oxygen fall perfectly on what's called the terrestrial fractionation line (TFL) showing that they match the ratios of the baseline Standard Mean Ocean Water (SMOW).

In other words, the ratios of O16, O17 and O18 in lunar rock samples originated from the same unique place that the ratios of O16, O17 and O18 did on Earth. (Samples from Mars and various meteorites have isotopic ratios which are parallel to the TFL showing that they started with a different initial mixture of oxygen isotopes).

The point about the lack of an iron core being somehow questionable is ludicrous. When Rhea collided with the proto-Earth , it's iron core amalgamated with Earth's iron core (due to density and gravity essentially) whilst the volatiles were all ejected which eventually coalesced into the Moon.

Oh and the Moon's craters are simply a result of the late-heavy bombardment went it was pulverised by rocks the size of skyscrapers for a few million years. No atmosphere to slow them down so it was the equivalent of a few trillion nuclear explosions detonating every few days :lol:
 
moshpit said:
Strange thread. I'm in the third year of an astrobiology degree - last year was primarily focussed on planetary formation and the origins of the solar system. Not really nay debate at all about he moon formation from what I can see. The isotopic ratios of oxygen fall perfectly on what's called the terrestrial fractionation line (TFL) showing that they match the ratios of the baseline Standard Mean Ocean Water (SMOW).

In other words, the ratios of O16, O17 and O18 in lunar rock samples originated from the same unique place that the ratios of O16, O17 and O18 did on Earth. (Samples from Mars and various meteorites have isotopic ratios which are parallel to the TFL showing that they started with a different initial mixture of oxygen isotopes).

The point about the lack of an iron core being somehow questionable is ludicrous. When Rhea collided with the proto-Earth , it's iron core amalgamated with Earth's iron core (due to density and gravity essentially) whilst the volatiles were all ejected which eventually coalesced into the Moon.

Oh and the Moon's craters are simply a result of the late-heavy bombardment went it was pulverised by rocks the size of skyscrapers for a few million years. No atmosphere to slow them down so it was the equivalent of a few trillion nuclear explosions detonating every few days :lol:
Click to expand...
So no aliens then? :-(
 
moshpit said:
Strange thread. I'm in the third year of an astrobiology degree - last year was primarily focussed on planetary formation and the origins of the solar system. Not really nay debate at all about he moon formation from what I can see. The isotopic ratios of oxygen fall perfectly on what's called the terrestrial fractionation line (TFL) showing that they match the ratios of the baseline Standard Mean Ocean Water (SMOW).

In other words, the ratios of O16, O17 and O18 in lunar rock samples originated from the same unique place that the ratios of O16, O17 and O18 did on Earth. (Samples from Mars and various meteorites have isotopic ratios which are parallel to the TFL showing that they started with a different initial mixture of oxygen isotopes).

The point about the lack of an iron core being somehow questionable is ludicrous. When Rhea collided with the proto-Earth , it's iron core amalgamated with Earth's iron core (due to density and gravity essentially) whilst the volatiles were all ejected which eventually coalesced into the Moon.

Oh and the Moon's craters are simply a result of the late-heavy bombardment went it was pulverised by rocks the size of skyscrapers for a few million years. No atmosphere to slow them down so it was the equivalent of a few trillion nuclear explosions detonating every few days :lol:
Click to expand...
get your hair cut
 
dangermows said:
I know people on here, including me, like to take the piss out of conspiracy theories but the story about us going to the moon, seeing aliens, who told us to fuck off, is fact.
Click to expand...

I watched this the other week and although it doesn't mention the moon it does tick the alien box.
Very interesting, I honestly don't know why this guy, a senior scientist for Lockheed Martin, would lie.

 
Last edited:
moshpit said:
Strange thread. I'm in the third year of an astrobiology degree - last year was primarily focussed on planetary formation and the origins of the solar system. Not really nay debate at all about he moon formation from what I can see. The isotopic ratios of oxygen fall perfectly on what's called the terrestrial fractionation line (TFL) showing that they match the ratios of the baseline Standard Mean Ocean Water (SMOW).

In other words, the ratios of O16, O17 and O18 in lunar rock samples originated from the same unique place that the ratios of O16, O17 and O18 did on Earth. (Samples from Mars and various meteorites have isotopic ratios which are parallel to the TFL showing that they started with a different initial mixture of oxygen isotopes).

The point about the lack of an iron core being somehow questionable is ludicrous. When Rhea collided with the proto-Earth , it's iron core amalgamated with Earth's iron core (due to density and gravity essentially) whilst the volatiles were all ejected which eventually coalesced into the Moon.

Oh and the Moon's craters are simply a result of the late-heavy bombardment went it was pulverised by rocks the size of skyscrapers for a few million years. No atmosphere to slow them down so it was the equivalent of a few trillion nuclear explosions detonating every few days :lol:
Click to expand...
Fucks this shite?
 
stephen cartwright said:
we have had this before mate but you are right, what the hell is it? surely they could have had a look during a space shuttle mission
Click to expand...
aye you would think so like. apparently it disappears or changes its orbit or something. bizarre.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top