Obviously this is not totally comprehensive. But interested in views
For a) read Man City/Mags b) Arsenal/Liverpool c) Gibson etc
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fair point as I chose one but would’ve preferred thatI'd prefer some middle ground between B and C.
I think you’re right, we have a billionaire with no links, with limitations, who won’t be splashing any cash.I'd prefer some middle ground between B and C. Which is probably what we've got really.
An Ellis Short but with a sensible spending strategy and much better staff under him.Other
Good post. I guess the question is more about how much success is the driver vs connection to area/moralsFor me the question is how B does it. If they splash the cash in a way where we don't get punished for it, and crucially in a way whereby we don't have to repay it, then it's clearly something you'd like as a fan. But if it's a billionaire like Short, pumping money in but ultimately meaning the club owes them a fortune, then it's a huge risk because if they don't invest well, or if they simply get bored, we're in a world of trouble. Realistically I'd expect the second option is a lot more likely, I don't think many would just throw money in a bottomless pit for the crack.
Definitely not D. C probably the safest, but very much depends on the definition of "limits". Deep down I think a lot would want A mind, not everyone by and means, but quite a few would take it over a lifetime of plodding around and not being able to genuinely compete. I'll stick to saying B though, but I'll have the hypothetical B who just loves spending his or her money and wants nowt in return!