AndrewP
Striker
I've never thought that of another male but each to their own marra!
That's not what your wife says marra.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've never thought that of another male but each to their own marra!
and your BMI is 40 because you have "big bones"
No idea what my BMI is (I checked and posted it once, so can't be ar*ed to do it again) but at 6'2"/14'5 I was fine and as I've already posted on this thread I'm "medium (not large) boned".
How's about you?
What is your height/weight - please don't come back with a BMI figure and I'm not interested in the size of your bones (at any time of the day)!
Circa 25 so about "normal". By the way, if someone tells you their BMI, it's the same as height/weight. It is calculated directly from the two, so in terms of judging people (as I'm sure you can't wait to do) then it's the same.
Yeah. He's my wife.I think I understand the way it's calculated but I don't see why I should have to look at a chart when I can relate, comfortably to someone providing sex/height/weight.
In addition, shoe size I find can often (but not always) be a factor in determining how heavy someone's bones are and so influence how their weight stacks up against the average when compared to their height.
Incidentally, my reply was to a post by Horatio Underpants, not your goodself, but you answered it - am I to believe that you and he the same person and you'd just forgotten which log in you were using?
I'm with your mate in the ivy ya fat cunt.Bad for the joints mate, seriously. Cross trainer for me (when available) and medium / light weigh training.
It's well known that diet accounts for far, far, more of your weight than exercise. There was a whole horizon episode about it saything that to burn off a donut that takes 20 seconds to eat would take like 6 hours of running (or something like that).http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-32417699
I posted a thread about this ages ago and was widely derided on here.
Must be a big donutIt's well known that diet accounts for far, far, more of your weight than exercise. There was a whole horizon episode about it saything that to burn off a donut that takes 20 seconds to eat would take like 6 hours of running (or something like that).
It's well known that diet accounts for far, far, more of your weight than exercise. There was a whole horizon episode about it saything that to burn off a donut that takes 20 seconds to eat would take like 6 hours of running (or something like that).
Dairy full fatand now the latest thinking is that full fat is fine. We've been sold a lie for 30 years.
Have you just wormed the dog?thats when(years ago) i was doing 5 hours exercise a day x 6 days & could eat out. beans , steak & noodles got me back to par, this is why country is fat , food has to look nice.
Logon or register to see this image
I'm with your mate in the ivy ya fat cunt.
That is beyond question.I nar. Says you are an arsehole.
No. It's not a myth so they never will.Have they burst the calorific myth yet?
I'm a firm believer that Counting Calories isn't the answer, as I'm sure that although of a high calorific value foods when eaten together have a different effect within the body.
How long a certain foodstuff burns in a flame, isn't really the same as what effect it has on the human body. As digestion is a chemical reaction / process then surely other foodstuffs will act as a catalyst / inhibitor when digested with others.
Have they burst the calorific myth yet?
I'm a firm believer that Counting Calories isn't the answer, as I'm sure that although of a high calorific value foods when eaten together have a different effect within the body.
How long a certain foodstuff burns in a flame, isn't really the same as what effect it has on the human body. As digestion is a chemical reaction / process then surely other foodstuffs will act as a catalyst / inhibitor when digested with others.
I've been counting cals since the 5th Jan. I've dropped 3 stone.Have they burst the calorific myth yet?
I'm a firm believer that Counting Calories isn't the answer, as I'm sure that although of a high calorific value foods when eaten together have a different effect within the body.
How long a certain foodstuff burns in a flame, isn't really the same as what effect it has on the human body. As digestion is a chemical reaction / process then surely other foodstuffs will act as a catalyst / inhibitor when digested with others.