aupaalaves
Striker
This has become a hot topic over here lately as the senate has just relaxed its dress code allowing Sen Fetterman to roll up to congress wearing a hoody and shorts looking like a f***ing schlub.
The usual refrain is that it doesn’t make a difference what you wear if you get the work done which is fair enough but I believe there are studies (not sure how reputable) that correlate productivity etc with formal business dress. Would you be OK with your MP of PM showing up to debate other heads of state wearing gym clothes? Do you think they’d be admired and respected if they did? Remember MIchael Foot being ostracised for wearing a duffel coat over his suit to a funeral, and even Blair got some shit for wearing Chelsea boots to a funeral. Let’s not forget the outrage when Obama wore a tan suit.
I was at a formal Catholic Hispanic wedding at the weekend. Dress was formal. Almost all males were in suits and most looking decent. One lad had a navy suit with white trainers and a white Henley. Looked shit. His mate stuck out for the wrong reasons in a western shirt and jeans. One bloke had a suit but a black crew neck T shirt which looks particularly shit. Any wedding over here seems to have at least one obligatory spenk with what I call Shelton-McGraw Syndrome as like those hapless twat country singers they seem unable to wedge their stupid cowboy hats off their heads no matter the time, place or occasion.
You’ve lost me now. How is a polo less comfortable than a T shirt? It’s made of mesh usually the whole point being that it wears cooler than solid cotton.
For me, a t-shirt is more comfortable