Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gets singled out for making glaring errors at times but oshea had just as many of those moments last season anarl btw. I wouldn't be upset if he stayed, plus he covers 2 positions.
Fuck off manOne of the worst defenders I have ever seen.
More than likely. He is certainly surplus to requirements here.I can see us sending out on loan to tje exact clubs that have decided not to bid for him
He's been good enough in both positions often enough to warrant keeping him on, otherwise he'd have been away at the end of last season. Converting him would save us money in a position we need to cover (assuming Bridcutt will be away) due to Cattermole's usual absences, and also put him in a position on the pitch where his lapses wouldn't be so costly.
As bad as our 'brilliant or shite and no middle ground' attitude is the complete failure to make the best of what we have.
Under contract. Stuck with him unless a buyer can be found.Not good enough, therefore why keep him?
What's all this nonsense? Where does it say that Vergini is under contract at Sunderland? Sounds like bollocks to me. If he'd got a contract then we'd have heard about it by now. There was no doubt an option to sign him, but to say we HAVE to sign him sounds ludicrous. If he was discussing a deal with an Argentinian side then that's enough proof that we are not obliged to buy him.Under contract. Stuck with him unless a buyer can be found.
"The Black Cats are duty-bound to sign Vergini in a £2million deal from Costa Rican outfit Sport Uruguay de Coronado this summer after he made more than 20 appearances in a red and white shirt during last season’s loan spell at the Stadium of Light."What's all this nonsense? Where does it say that Vergini is under contract at Sunderland? Sounds like bollocks to me. If he'd got a contract then we'd have heard about it by now. There was no doubt an option to sign him, but to say we HAVE to sign him sounds ludicrous. If he was discussing a deal with an Argentinian side then that's enough proof that we are not obliged to buy him.
"The Black Cats are duty-bound to sign Vergini in a £2million deal from Costa Rican outfit Sport Uruguay de Coronado this summer after he made more than 20 appearances in a red and white shirt during last season’s loan spell at the Stadium of Light."
Say it in the article mate if you'd care to read it.
http://www.sunderlandecho.com/sport...r-sunderland-over-defender-s-future-1-7344664
What's all this nonsense? Where does it say that Vergini is under contract at Sunderland? Sounds like bollocks to me. If he'd got a contract then we'd have heard about it by now. There was no doubt an option to sign him, but to say we HAVE to sign him sounds ludicrous. If he was discussing a deal with an Argentinian side then that's enough proof that we are not obliged to buy him.
Bollocks, he is currently an Estudiantes de la Plata player or a free agent, one or the other.No - it's proof that we are trying to dig ourselves out of the hole that we have got ourselves into, and are hoping we can do so before we have to announce that we have signed him.
Face it mate, he's a Sunderland player and the club are actively trying to get rid. Just because you don't like the fact does not make it the reality.Bollocks, he is currently an Estudiantes de la Plata player or a free agent, one or the other.
Bollocks, he is currently an Estudiantes de la Plata player or a free agent, one or the other.